Unveiling the Impact of Corporate Dominance on Veterinary Industry and Animal Welfare: The Unknown Narrative

The veterinary industry is changing rapidly, especially with large corporations taking over pet care services. This shift raises important questions about animal welfare, the motivations behind these corporations, and the grassroots movements that are fighting back. In this post, we will explore these facets and how they affect the crucial relationship between animals and their veterinarians.

Dr Scott Summers, Dr David Reader and Dr Linda Joyce-Jones at Bangor University meeting

The Shift Towards Corporatisation

Corporatisation has transformed the veterinary sector dramatically in recent years. For example, almost 60% of veterinary practices are now owned by large corporate groups, up from just 10% in 2013. Unlike traditional clinics that foster personal connections and tailored care, corporate-owned facilities often rely on standard protocols aimed at efficiency and profit. This focus on operational metrics can dilute the quality of care, as individual needs may be overshadowed by corporate goals. This is certainly not on the vet nurses that treat our pets to the very best of their ability, but the corporates enforce certain policies that have wealth above health.

When corporations prioritize profits, veterinarians may face pressure to recommend more expensive procedures instead of simpler, cost-effective treatments. For instance, a recent study found that 30% of pet owners reported being encouraged to choose more costly treatments even when basic care would suffice. This approach risks compromising individualized patient care, which has been the foundation of veterinary practice.

The Impact on Animal Welfare

The growing corporatisation of veterinary services has alarming implications for animal welfare. Companies aiming to maximize revenue may suggest treatments based on profit potential rather than what is best for the animals. A report indicated that while more than 60% of veterinarians express concern about the corporatisation model, many feel restricted by corporate policies that prioritize financial success.

Additionally, this focus on costs can create a disconnect between veterinarians and pet owners. When monetary considerations are at the forefront, the emotional and psychological needs of both pets and their owners can be overlooked. For example, a pet suffering from anxiety might receive minimal attention, with the focus on profitability overshadowing the more compassionate route of behavioural support.

Campaigns Against Corporate Takeover

Grassroots campaigns have emerged in response to the trend of corporatisation in veterinary care. A key figure in this movement is Linda Joyce-Jones from Wales, who has mobilized efforts to raise awareness about the negative effects of corporate dominance. She has successfully organized numerous public awareness events, demonstrating how corporate practices diminish the quality of care.

These campaigns emphasize the necessity of supporting independent veterinary practices that prioritize personalized care. For instance, in response to declining public trust in corporate clinics, numerous communities have rallied to demand transparency in veterinary practices, resulting in over 40% of surveyed pet owners expressing a preference for local veterinarians who genuinely care about animal welfare.

We have attended a few of Dr Linda Joyce-Jones' organised events to discuss the issue. The latest meeting was held at Bangor University in April 2025. Carlie and Mandy from CatsMatter attended the event which saw Dr Scott Summers, Dr David Reader, Dr Suzanna Hudson-Cooke BVetMED MRCVS and Jayne Dendle do speeches about how the corporatisation of the veterinary industry has affected their fields. Suzanna, who is Branch Chair of British Veterinary Union in Unite, gave an in-depth details talk on how corporatisation has affected many aspects of vet care now, and highlighted the danger it poses to our pets in terms of the care they receive. Jayne, Founder and Director of Save Our Seized Dogs, spoke about the impact this has on banned breeds, particularly in regard to cost implications with insurance unavailable to Pit Bull type dogs and restricted to two companies for XL Bullies. Linda gave a heartfelt speech on why she started this campaign and an informative talk on the importance of highlighting this subject with law makers and discussing what needs to be done to regulate the industry in ways that is not being done at present.

Carlie and Mandy from CatsMatter with Campaigner Linda (centre)

Detrimental Effects on Animal Welfare

Critics of the corporatisation model warn that it creates a healthcare system where wealth supersedes animal health. Evidence shows that corporate-driven practices often lead to a standardized approach that neglects individual animal needs. As one veterinarian noted, "Incorporation often means treating animals like products rather than patients." This is a stark contrast to the historical focus on the well-being of each animal.

Additionally, corporate ownership introduces a greater risk of homogenization in care, where specialized treatments are replaced by generic solutions. This shift can lead to negative health outcomes for pets. For instance, a shelter that transitioned to a corporate model reported a 25% increase in avoidable health issues among treated animals, emphasizing the potential threats posed by prioritizing profit over care.

The Role of Corporates in Veterinary Services

Besides veterinary clinics, corporations have expanded into various segments of the pet care market, such as pet crematoriums and food production. This consolidation raises ethical concerns regarding the motivations behind such diversification. With corporations extending their influence into multiple areas of animal care, conflicts of interest can arise. Decisions may be swayed more by financial prospects than by the genuine needs of the animals.

For example, a large corporate entity owned both a chain of veterinary clinics and a food manufacturing company, leading to concerns that veterinarians might be encouraged to recommend products from the same corporation, regardless of dietary necessity.

The Voices Against Corporatisation

Despite the challenges posed by corporatisation, advocates like Linda Joyce-Jones remain resilient. Her campaign in Wales highlights the need for transparency and accountability in veterinary care. By galvanizing public concerns and advocating for legislative changes, these grassroots movements seek to refocus the veterinary industry on animal welfare.

Public awareness is essential in opposing this corporatisation trend. Consumers must be educated on their choices and how these choices impact their pets’ health. Supporting independent veterinarians who prioritize comprehensive care over corporate profits can serve as a significant pushback against the corporatisation of the veterinary field.

Safeguarding Animal Welfare

The corporatisation of the veterinary sector presents serious challenges to animal welfare. As corporations continue to expand their influence, the risk of prioritizing profits over proper care becomes increasingly critical. However, the rise of grassroots campaigns signifies hope for a future where veterinary practices continue to focus on the genuine well-being of animals.

Through informed choices and active advocacy, pet owners and animal advocates can preserve the core values of veterinary medicine. By supporting independent practices and demanding a shift towards compassionate care, we can collectively safeguard the welfare of our beloved animal companions.

We will pop a link to the video of the discussion HERE once available.